bitfury.com

7Th/s KNCMiner Jupiter and Bitfury Bitcoin Miners 7000Gh/s KNC Not Cointerra for sale best offer in BTC gets it.

Listing a package of mining gear that averages about 7Th/s at the pool, in this case BTC Guild. Hash rate will vary between about 6800-7050 but could move by as much as 10% like most miners. I cherry picked a number of units from my collection of primarily KNC gear to focus on high performing systems that provide a great hash rate with reasonable
Since some potential buyers have asked I pulled up a Bitcoin calculator for 7Th/s with BTC = $560 USD. Obviously with the variable exchange rate, and difficulty increases estimated it's a possible look but not for sure.
This Difficulty Coins Dollars per Day 0.70310438 BTC $393.74 per Week 4.92173067 BTC $2,756.17 per Month 21.37437318 BTC $11,969.65 this diff (est) 4.59761908 BTC $2,574.67 Next Difficulty [estimated] Coins Dollars per Day 0.61923263 BTC $346.77 per Week 4.33462844 BTC $2,427.39 per Month 18.82467208 BTC $10,541.82
All KNCMiner systems running 1.0 firmware with custom clock and voltage settings, clock settings I use not allowed in the stock firmware but all running solid and tested for weeks now. All units have custom fans installed to help maintain ASIC and VRM temperatures.
To maintain the listed hash rates units will need to be run with covers off, ambient temperature where I run all KNC units in my crowded basement is about 78F.
6 x KNCMiner November Jupiter with EVGA 1000W Power Supply - 5500Gh/s 1 x KNCMiner October Jupiter 6 module with Lepa 1600W Power Supply - 1025Gh/s 1 x Bitfury 16 Card System with Raspberry Pi 32GB SD and custom Case, Thermaltake Power Supply - 500Gh/s
Pics available upon request.
Send me an offer want to sell today.
submitted by Bitcoinminer1 to Bitcoin [link] [comments]

Bitcoin Roundtable: "A Call for Consensus from a community of Bitcoin exchanges, wallets, miners & mining pools." (Signed: Bitfinex, BitFury, BitmainWarranty, BIT-X Exchange, BTCC, BTCT & BW, F2Pool, Genesis Mining, GHash.IO, LIGHTNINGASIC, Charlie Lee, Spondoolies-Tech, Smartwallet)

Bitcoin Roundtable: submitted by eragmus to Bitcoin [link] [comments]

Bitcoin's specification (eg: Excess Blocksize (EB) & Acceptance Depth (AD), configurable via Bitcoin Unlimited) can, should & always WILL be decided by ALL the miners & users - not by a single FIAT-FUNDED, CENSORSHIP-SUPPORTED dev team (Core/Blockstream) & miner (BitFury) pushing SegWit 1.7MB blocks

TL;DR:
The market will inevitably prefer:
This means that the market of Bitcoin users and miners will reject Core/Blockstream's SegWit (with its centrally-planned 1.7MB blocksize and dangerous "anyone-can-spend" soft-fork semantics) - and the market will prefer Bitcoin Unlimited, which supports market-based (user-configurable) blocksize based on a much simpler & safer hard fork - allowing essentially "unlimited" growth in Bitcoin adoption and price.
Details
Seriously folks, think about it:
How many successful broad-based socio-economic disruptive technologies allow their "community debate" about the high-level system specification to be centrally controlled and censored by a bunch of low-level (C++) implementation providers (and a bunch of central bankers funding them with fiat)?
The Bitcoin community never really asked for SegWit-as-a-soft-fork. It's being forced on us.
SegWit has been the horrendous misbegotten result of years of trolling from three stubborn out-of-touch devs who happened to get millions of dollars in fiat from central bankers: u/nullc and u/adam3us and the odd u/luke-jr who they carefully keep at arm's length - and a tiny army of lesser trolls, trotting out the same-old tired totally debunked, massively downvoted arguments - all supported by central banker trolls who provided $76 million in fiat to fund this misguided mess.
Many people in the Bitcoin community have never really participated in or even seen a serious, open, and honest debate about SegWit versus Bitcoin Unlimited - because there are basically only two kinds of people in the Bitcoin community now:
Bitcoin development used to be dominated by forward-thinking, community-responsive, devs supporting simple and safe on-chain scaling like Satoshi Nakamoto (whose quotes are banned on r\bitcoin), Gavin Andresen (ceaselessly hounded and attacked by an army of trolls) and Mike Hearn (whose greatest invention may have been the forgotten Lighthouse project - which could have given us bitcoin-funded ie non-fiat-funded development).
Now Bitcoin development is dominated by Debbie Downers and Dead Enders like u/nullc and u/adam3us and u/luke-jr who have never really believed that Bitcoin can scale on-chain and succeed the way that Satoshi said it could.
They've been doing everything they can to destroy Satoshi's successful experiment - refusing to remove Bitcoin's temporary 1MB anti-spam kludge for purely political and not technical reasons, and now trying to force everyone to adopt SegWit - the final, fatal kludge.
If it wasn't for the massive censoring on r\bitcoin, then a tsunami of true cypherpunk freedom and real community consensus would wash that cesspool clean, and the fiat-funded voices of u/nullc and u/adam3us and u/luke-jr (and the tiny minority of their vocal but misguided supporters) would sink the the bottom of every thread, a forgotten footnote of history with their shitty soft kludgy centrally-planned anyone-can-spend 1.7MB 1-to-4-discount SegWit soft-fork poison pill.
If Bitcoin gets upgraded the way Satoshi said it would (via flag days and/or hard forks - also known as a simple protocol upgrade or a full node referendum), then the community would reject Core/Blockstream's shitty centralized SegWit spaghetti-code soft fork, and Core/Blockstream would be forgotten - and their investors would be furious.
The Bitcoin community isn't stupid.
Economically intelligent Bitcoin users and miners will not vote against our own economic interests.
We will not "upgrade" to dangerous, messy, dead-end technology (SegWit) which needlessly overcomplicates our codebase and needlessly suppresses Bitcoin's userbase and price - when we can just as easily updrade to something clean and simple and growth-oriented like Bitcoin Unlimited, which keeps our codebase clean and simple and safe, while providing an open-ended, market-based, long-term solution for blocksize, supporting long-term (essentially "unlimited") growth in Bitcoin's userbase and price.
Everyone (ie, everyone who gets their information on uncensored forums like btc and who isn't getting millions of dollars in fiat from central bankers) knows by now that:
It is the very softness (ie: kludginess) of SegWit which would make future upgrades to Bitcoin so much more difficult and complicated (aka "technical debt").
Worst of all: SegWit would introduce a radical, unknown, untested exotic new threat vector: a totally new type of "51% attack" where old coins would now also be at risk (due to SegWit's "anyone-can-spend" semantics - which would be totally unnecessary to use if SegWit had been done as a clean and safe hard fork, instead of a messy and dangerous soft fork).
The stubbornness (and recklessness) of insisting on doing SegWit as this kind of dangerous and messy soft fork is 100% because Blockstream is afraid to do a clean and safe "hard" fork - because a hard fork lets Bitcoin users and miners actually have an explicit "vote" - or a "full node referendum" - and Core/Blockstream knows that the result would most likely be that Bitcoin users and miners would "dump" Core/Blockstream's shitty code with its centrally-planned 1.7MB blocksize and its dangerous anyone-can-spend soft-fork hack.
So Core/Blockstream are trying to force more dangerous, less useful code on the network, using the toxic tools of fiat and censorship, purely for their own selfish "political" and "economic" reasons.
Core/Blockstream has millions of dollars in fiat now so they don't care if they continue to suppress the Bitcoin price like they have since they came on the scene in late 2014.
This trader's price & volume graph / model predicted that we should be over $10,000 USD/BTC by now. The model broke in late 2014 - when AXA-funded Blockstream was founded, and started spreading propaganda and crippleware, centrally imposing artificially tiny blocksize to suppress the volume & price.
https://np.reddit.com/btc/comments/5obe2m/this_traders_price_volume_graph_model_predicted/
Also see a similar graph in u/Peter__R's recent article on Medium - where the graph clearly shows the same Bitcoin price suppression - ie price uncoupling from adoption and dipping below the previous tightly correlated trend - starting right at that fateful moment when Blockstream came on the scene and told Bitcoiners that we can't have nice things anymore like on-chain scaling and increasing adoption and price: late 2014.
So, Core/Blockstream offers inferior, centrally planned, dangerous messy code - and they are responsible for not only splitting the community but also even arguably suppressing Bitcoin adoption and price - and now they're such bold arrogant fuckheads that they want to make their hegemony permanent by monopolizing Bitcoin governance forever in the future by sneaking in their shittier and shittier code starting with the Trojan Horse of SegWit-as-a-soft-fork with its centrally-planned hard-coded parameters and radical dangerous new anti-security model making all UTXOs "anyone-can-spend" - recklessly and needlessly exposing Bitcoin to exotic, unknown attack vectors which have never existed before in its 8 years of safe and successful growth.
Core/Blockstream don't give a fuck if they hurt us Bitcoin users and miners in the process - because they don't care about you - they only care about themselves - and the central bankers who are paying them.
Bitcoin Unlimited isn't influenced by censorship or fiat.
The bottom line is:
Evaluating our "upgrade options" in those (technological and economic and "governance") terms is the right way to evaluate these things - indeed it is the only way to evaluate these things - and everybody (except a bunch of unpopular out-of-touch devs and shills sucking the dicks of central bankers) knows that SegWit's messy technology, economic and scaling dead-end, and centralized governance is totally inferior to Bitcoin Unlimited, on all three counts.
Everyone knows that:
With Bitcoin Unlimited, the community continues to be in control - of our code, our governance, and our blocksize - not a tiny handful of fiat-funded devs and miners like Core/Blockstream and BitFury and a tiny minority of their outspoken supporters (who are well-known on this forum - just look at the bottom of every thread, where they are massively downvoted - but never censored! - after spouting their tired, tedious, repeatedly debunked astroturf arguments).
The next time those people try to attack the idea of market-based blocksize, we know how to make their heads explode, just by asking them:
If the users the miners shouldn't decide the blocksize - then who the fuck should??
And if that kind of conversation were to continue, it might go like:
Who should decide the blocksize - you or me?
_"Small-blockers" Blocksize central planners are satisfied with a centrally planned one-time hard-coded bump to 1.7MB blocks via a dangerous messy convoluted "soft" fork called SegWit which actually centralizes and suppresses Bitcoin by pricing most people off of the blockchain. Fine, that's your opinion and you're free to say it and we're free to downvote it and to reject your poorly written code with its centrally-planned 1.7MB blocksize and its anyone-can-spend hack.
Meanwhile, the vast majority of Bitcoin users and miners want to be free - and we want our code to be simple and safe. We support market-based blocksize so our code and our markets can be free of some ridiculous arbitrary centrally planned hard-coded 1MB 1.7MB blocksize - and we want our code to be fred of messy, dangerous hacks and kludges lke SegWit. Instead, we support decentralized governance and market-based, non-centrally-planned, open-ended Bitcoin debate and open-ended Bitcoin economic and social growth and adoption.
The Bitcoin community can and should and therefore eventually (inevitably) will adapt the software solution which explicitly supports users and miners deciding the blocksize in a clean, safe, future-proof "hard" fork called Bitcoin Unlimited.
In the end, the market will choose the approach (SegWit or Bitcoin Unlimited) which provides the most economic incentives, using the simplest and safest technology.
Economic incentives, based on using the simplest and safest technology, are what drives Bitcoin and makes it succeed.
  • Blockstream/Core and BitFury can "afford" to ignore the will of the Bitcoin community, and can "afford" to ignore their own economic incentives - because they have millions of dollars in fiat, and they communicate on censored forums. They're fiat-funded, centralized, censored, and fragile. They're fine with making their codebase even more centralized and fragile - by adopting SegWit.
  • The rest of the Bitcoin community communicates on non-censored forums, and we want to maximize the value of our investments in Bitcoin. We're community-oriented and our code supports market-based blocksize using simple and safe and flexible and upgradeable code - so we're adopting Bitcoin Unlimited.
You are free to choose between these two options - based on your own economic incentives, and based on your understanding of the best technology roadmap:
How rich are you gonna get with SegWit, now and in the long term?
  • SegWit is dangerous and messy, fiat-funded, censorship-supported centrally-planned soft-fork spaghetti code - creating zombie nodes and requiring millions of lines of risky code changes in all wallets, exchanges and business software - and in the end only offering an arbitrary pathetic 1.7MB blocksize - and recklessly making all transactions anyone-can-spend - while increasing "dev team lock-in" and continuing to centrally suppress Bitcoin's adoption and price. ... versus:
How rich are you gonna get with Bitcoin Unlimited, now and in the long term?
  • Bitcoin Unlimited is clean & safe community-supported non-fiat-funded, non-censorship-based code, providing a long-term scaling and governance solution offering market-based blocksize, where users and miners will continue to determine the size of blocks (as they actually quite successfully and profitably have for the past 8 years), based on our understanding of current financial and technological conditions, while continuing to support unlimited growth in Bitcoin's adoption and price (as we've also seen for the past 8 years).
The market of Bitcoin users and miners (ie, you) can and should (and therefore will) decide!
submitted by ydtm to btc [link] [comments]

Bitfury-Backed Bitcoin Miner Hut 8 Prepares to Go Public

Bitfury-Backed Bitcoin Miner Hut 8 Prepares to Go Public submitted by jaxnax to Bitcoin [link] [comments]

The Bitcoin Halving Approaches: Miners BitFury and BTCC Not Concerned

The Bitcoin Halving Approaches: Miners BitFury and BTCC Not Concerned submitted by tylev to Bitcoin [link] [comments]

Bitfury Brings Out The Big Guns With Launch Of Next-Gen Bitcoin Miner ASIC • r/bitcoinxt

Bitfury Brings Out The Big Guns With Launch Of Next-Gen Bitcoin Miner ASIC • bitcoinxt submitted by Ibinex to BitcoinNews [link] [comments]

Bitfury Brings Out The Big Guns With Launch Of Next-Gen Bitcoin Miner ASIC

Bitfury Brings Out The Big Guns With Launch Of Next-Gen Bitcoin Miner ASIC submitted by ABitcoinAllBot to BitcoinAll [link] [comments]

Tone Vays - Bitcoin Brief - Cody Wilson, BitFury Miners, Exchange Manipulation & Chaum's (Not)Better Bitcoin

Tone Vays - Bitcoin Brief - Cody Wilson, BitFury Miners, Exchange Manipulation & Chaum's (Not)Better Bitcoin submitted by Yanlii to cryptovideos [link] [comments]

Bitcoin Miner Bitfury Knows How to Make Cooling 95% More Effective

submitted by cryptoanalyticabot to blockchainanalytics [link] [comments]

Bitcoin Miner Bitfury Knows How to Make Cooling 95% More Effective

submitted by cryptoallbot1 to cryptoall [link] [comments]

@ulrichrosenbaum : Bitcoin Miner Bitfury Knows How to Make Cooling 95% More Effective Retweet if you like it! https://t.co/8AEuBz6sPH

submitted by ulros to digitalbanking [link] [comments]

Bitfury Brings Out The Big Guns With Launch Of Next-Gen Bitcoin Miner ASIC

Bitfury Brings Out The Big Guns With Launch Of Next-Gen Bitcoin Miner ASIC submitted by Ibinex to bitcoinxt [link] [comments]

Bitcoin's Best Funded Miner BitFury Rasies Another $20 Million

Bitcoin's Best Funded Miner BitFury Rasies Another $20 Million submitted by bubbasparse to Bitcoin [link] [comments]

Bitfury-Backed Bitcoin Miner Secures Canadian Land Deal

Bitfury-Backed Bitcoin Miner Secures Canadian Land Deal submitted by BTCNews to BTCNews [link] [comments]

Mining • Hut 8 Mining Corp, A BitFury backed Bitcoin Miner Set to go Public

submitted by btcforumbot to BtcForum [link] [comments]

Bitfury-Backed Bitcoin Miner Hut 8 Prepares to Go Public

Bitfury-Backed Bitcoin Miner Hut 8 Prepares to Go Public submitted by HiIAMCaptainObvious to BitcoinAll [link] [comments]

Bitfury-Backed Bitcoin Miner Secures Canadian Land Deal

Bitfury-Backed Bitcoin Miner Secures Canadian Land Deal submitted by leftok to atbitcoin [link] [comments]

Bitcoin miner steps out into the light: Profile of Valery Nebesny, the guy behind the Ukrainian mining powerhouse BitFury

submitted by EconHacker to Bitcoin [link] [comments]

Bitcoin miner BitFury looks to invest $100 million in next data center (ZDNet)

Bitcoin miner BitFury looks to invest $100 million in next data center (ZDNet) submitted by ILikeGreenit to bitcoinxt [link] [comments]

Bitfury-Backed Bitcoin Miner Secures Canadian Land Deal

Bitfury-Backed Bitcoin Miner Secures Canadian Land Deal submitted by ravikaash to Cryptoalert [link] [comments]

When Bitcoin forks to larger blocks will Blockstream and their only miner Bitfury reset difficulty on their chain?

submitted by Bitcoin3000 to btc [link] [comments]

Bitfury-Backed Bitcoin Miner Secures Canadian Land Deal...

Bitfury-Backed Bitcoin Miner Secures Canadian Land Deal... submitted by HiIAMCaptainObvious to BitcoinAll [link] [comments]

Canada Crypto Mining - HUT8 Mining -Bitfury - 8min Documentary by Jan Cerato - Bitcoin Bitfury 16nm ASIC Demo - Part 1 of 3 Bitfury's BlockBox in Norway Red Fury USB ASIC miner by BitFury About Bitcoin Mining

Bitfury Tardis is another bitcoin mining hardware you can purchase to build passive income. The model runs on BitFury latest Clarke chip technology and provides a mind gobbling 80 Th/s. However, this might mean more Bitcoin for you via mining, but the high Power Consumption kills this feature. Tardis ASIC Bitcoin miner uses 6300W of power to mine your favorite Cryptocurrency. Besides it also ... Bitfury is a diversified blockchain company, the largest industrial miner outside China, developer of software and hardware for working with the Bitcoin blockchain. The company has offices in San Francisco, Washington, D.C., Hong Kong, London and Amsterdam. It has data centers in Iceland, Norway, Canada and the Republic of Georgia. Hier sollte eine Beschreibung angezeigt werden, diese Seite lässt dies jedoch nicht zu. Bitfury B8. Description. Model B8 from Bitfury mining SHA-256 algorithm with a maximum hashrate of 49Th/s for a power consumption of 6400W. Profitability . Period /day /month /year ; Income: $4.98 (0.0003 BTC) $149.46 (0.0114 BTC) $1,793.52 (0.1375 BTC) Electricity-$18.43-$552.96-$6,635.52: Profit-$13.45-$403.50-$4,842.00: Exchange rate 1 BTC = $13,037.13. Algorithms. Algorythm Hashrate ... BitFury – BitFury is one of the largest producers of Bitcoin mining hardware and chips. Its hardware is not available for purchase. Bitcoin Mining Equipment . In addition to a Bitcoin mining ASIC, you’ll need some other Bitcoin mining equipment: Power Supply – Bitcoin rigs need special power supplies to funnel and use electricity efficiently. Cooling Fans – Bitcoin hardware can easily ...

[index] [22192] [2591] [31096] [47573] [13299] [24664] [19785] [41981] [44445] [27762]

Canada Crypto Mining - HUT8 Mining -Bitfury - 8min Documentary by Jan Cerato - Bitcoin

This is 1 out of 3 videos in series about our new 16nm Bitcoin Mining ASIC where we demonstrate the low power performance of the chip. Notice that there is no heat sink attached. In the next ... In 2018, Bitfury opened a bitcoin mining center in Moi-i-Rana, Norway, powered entirely by Bitfury's proprietary and cutting-edge BlockBoxes. Bitfury is a leading security and infrastructure ... Leading blockchain firm Bitfury answers a common question about bitcoin mining - how many bitcoin have been mined already? To learn more, visit https://bitfu... Learn more about immersion cooling, Bitfury's innovative datacenter solution for more sustainable and efficient bitcoin mining centers. See more products at ... Bitfury Presents: Teeka Tiwari and the Future of Bitcoin (Russian subtitles) ... Alberta Bitcoin Mining with Steve Barbour of Upstream Data - Duration: 7:09. BTC Sessions 1,147 views. 7:09 ...

#